Strange American Election

Am I alone in the U.S. elections for President, well ….. funny place? A few weeks or sometimes when I’m listening to the DNC Convention in Denver. “DNC? Also seemed strange to me. It reminded me of a certain type of medical procedures. Well, it’s the Democratic National Convention. The first one I saw was a bias in political reporting and coverage of different networks and cable affiliates. I had to consider whether the various “commentators” were actually on the same event.

If I wanted to get a positive spin on the Republican side, I stayed on Fox. I tried to be fair and even though I have no links with the Democratic candidates, especially because some fear that hangs over Hillary and Bill, I tune to CNN. My God, I wish I was not so weak, but at least Osama is relatively pleasant to see and hear. McCann old man is to believe that it is difficult to see how long it can achieve.

But still, very few reports “that the current New Hard feel, and the candidates? This poses. I just could not get over how much they have to play together. Poor Obama, so it was left to appease the veranda of Hillary supporters. It is obvious that these people do not actually like the other. When Hillary was “strong” expressed their full support for an Obama presidency, it was more like a test for his own candidacy. Give her credit, she finally showed, and a strong self-address, but for them it was too late. That is all about creating can “party unity”, but also one of those exhumed from the Convention, Hillary, Obama is likely to lose hope as they run in 2012. Like, c is someone that I just had my back.

I never saw Obama’s acceptance speech, but acknowledged that it can be for themselves. A lawyer, after all? It’s funny, because many political commentators use what we call language, is the turnover to describe the process. “Oh, Obama will finish the operation on Thursday:” I’m kind of Glad Obama can be counted in order to “close” to themselves. Maybe we should, that his views in a president. Then there is the whole description of what the various messages from supporters of both parties. Phrases such as “red meat”, I suppose that means substance and the role of different stakeholders and, as McCain was not necessary to be an attack dog, I think somebody else “relish this role.

Any part on the conventions are quite a spectacle. It is even more ironic that the political “experts dissect” both impact and intent, what the candidates said how, both by special features and if they go on. Larry King had a group of four women who stop racing each other and to destroy or build what the candidates about what they were. Everybody seems to know or seem to know what the American people want. It is feeling that all this be explained to most Americans need. I wonder how many people know what a caucus or how the parties choose their candidates. What are the delegates at all? How to make a “super-delegates? Now, very impressive. Some of the women on Larry King seemed to slam Sarah Palin and insisted that “women” would be offended that a woman would do alone.

Perhaps women like Sarah Palin for reasons “they” like her and this is not the same as women, like Hillary. Everyone seems to think they know the intelligence of American voters. The same voters who remain in place and record the reality TV “and watch dancing with the stars. Given some of whom he was elected because of the popularity. Is not that why they call the referendum? I must admit, John McCain looks much better with Sarah Palin by his side. It is simply too boring to be selected by himself. There is also a little confused as to the effectiveness of the Republican Party wants to portray John McCain as a war here, because he was a prisoner of war. How can we know what happened during his time as a prisoner? Did you know that his father and grandfather were admirals? I remember this scene from a popular movie called “The Recruit” Colin Farrell as that represented a break under torture. Then, when Farrell was organized from his capture, he complained, is yeah, but I cracked. Al Pacino has joked that his CIA Svengali they (we) do all of them. How many of us would not in rats that in these circumstances.

All this is happening, even abroad, where the cable from my hotel and I went to see a library of DVDs of The Manchurian Candidate. It was strange how similar some of today’s problems. A writer friend insists that some all American elections have already given. “It does not matter if you own all the ponies in the race” It is interesting to note the commitment of the two “normal people” and ease controls obvious bias in the media.

I started my own poll, just talk to people about their thoughts. A woman in Sacramento proposed not to work in a grocery store, they trusted Obama, referring to an obscure mention of his patriotism. Although she was vague on details, and she was in a predominantly white suburb. Two women in a real estate convention, friends have different opinions was the Governor Palin, a woman, she was a mother like Palin offered. The other woman any kind of do not have the permission of body language. At least one woman on “expert” Larry King panel of four women said that women “others might be” jealous of Sarah Palin referred chances or looks.

That would be unprecedented. It seems almost like the political machine is not quite ready for the unusual Ness and complexity of a woman like Sarah Palin, not only in politics, but his influence on men and women. I noticed the other day, Cindy McCain, who is the First Lady was not just an opinion. Finally, I noticed him wearing a rather revealing a portal boosted fission, a little. Yes, it’s always a bit of fun.

It seems that most people who vote for them to vote for the president because of their personal preferences. Maybe something like a sad statement, but many people could simply choose a candidate for the reasons we buy all types of cars. , I’m not sure that everything is bad. Maybe things like intuition and anyone can relate to a person are equally important. The whole question of experience and qualifications are the central themes of these campaigns. I wonder how some of these candidates would in the real world (yikes!) As an attempt to get a top job of the company.

I have heard, Google has, for example up to twelve layers of the interview process and in particular to groups that actually in real life situations, where you can demonstrate your skills. No to the American presidency, however. Again, who really blame Obama, he has decided not to take Hillary as his running mate? Is it different from a director of a corporation to elect someone they have better chemistry, to be faithful to them or play a better man wing or someone to be ready?

No. I really do not see that Hillary comfortable shifting to big O. They do not seem like a good loser. It seemed years ago, the elections seem …. plus a presidential suite. He started by seeing Bill C sax on Saturday Night Live playing. Since then, nothing has been, as I remember, when John F. Kennedy became president.

If we believe that “experts say” us, we’ll see what the candidates are really staying in the coming days. It seems more a war of attrition. Who will take? Who does not want a bigger mess than their phalanx of image-handling may become entangled, they dig? It is surprising that the “good” candidate really is, or will it really be one can not survive. I expected Obama, a little more qualified some of the things that we spill from his mouth. moment of inattention or unconscious meanings?

Sarah Palin seems to have surpassed even the stars own candidate. Meanwhile, we face the most recent failures and government bailouts of banks investing on Wall Street. First, the housing market and mortgage industry, now this. If these people can not operate their own business, who will? What is the company run America? Oh, we’re back to this issue. I was hoping, praying I really want some evidence to Congress and the Senate that we see some fairness in the defense to its list of mad about it, the economic rescue outs.I wanted to see if McCain or Obama would do something.

The fact that its meaning is not buy no real difference in principle among the parties, the real power elite that controls The results of our nation. Somewhere in all this is the possibility that more and more people are actually in a swelling of intelligence and do something for themselves, we hope that the candidate … Think and act in accordance with a reasonable plan to close America. Hopefully the truth about this election is there, somewhere, among all the spins, the disillusioned, the non-believers and fervent hopes.

Hope that is the true spirit of democracy and freedom instilled in the people related, not in a big fat wedggie, regardless of the pollsters, the media and even the candidates themselves

Only in America. Strange, but true … and a little strange.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Battle between democratic congress and republican president

The Democrats will be in the next two years as provided by the tugs in different directions in question. You want a good job for the American people so they re-elected in 2008, and to win the presidency. A group of pragmatists, who believe represented by Tim Walz, Minnesota, elected officials, that the American public voted for healing. Americans want, according to Walz, a time to recover from a broken government implement policies and corruption poor recovery. On the other hand, several other new Democrats ideologues, like their Republican colleagues in the bureau that in 1994, has been leading the Republican revolution and produced the Contract with America. This time in a more conservative America has come in many ways, resulting in something like tax cuts and a combative attitude toward the defense.

The objectives of the Democrats already contain contradictions. The next speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi wants, such as financial responsibility. You want to reduce the budget balance and public debt, with a “pay as you go” funding system. But already, it will be and some Democrats for things like tuition tax deductible, cutting interest rates student loan news, increased coverage of health insurance, funding for research embryonic stem cells, and a national cap on industrial emissions of carbon dioxide. All these programs cost money worthy.

The theory of democracy, to pay for all this and more, getting rid of tax cuts “for the rich.” They also want to make life just by increasing the minimum wage.

Republicans against the Democrats on the economy

Republicans believe that Democrats will raise taxes on everyone, not just the rich. You feel that raising taxes only on “the rich will hurt” the economy, kill the goose that lays golden eggs, the current economic situation is strong, with unemployment low and the market higher Stocks in history. The Republicans believe that increasing the minimum wage will hurt businesses.

Democrats counter that yes, there are many jobs, but they “Wall Mart jobs, poorly paid with little gain and no unions. Democrats believe that increasing the minimum wage will not hurt business. In fact They point to the theory that Henry Ford pays workers a livable wage that will allow them to buy more products, helping businesses.

Moreover, Democrats want to lower prices for drugs for Medicare patients to negotiate, you do something about the loss of industrial jobs overseas, and the fight, President Bush on the privatization of Social Security.

Presidential Power and investigations

Bush will continue to try the powers of the presidency, an area where Democrats think Bush has intervened to strengthen too.

Some Democrats want investigations into missteps in the war on terrorism and the treatment of prisoners of Bush’s expansion of executive power. Pelosi is a moderate on this issue. He rejects outright, for example, impeachment proceedings against Bush. She was pleased that President Bush has accepted the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

Iraq

leads on Iraq, Democrats see clear to the withdrawal, and the place of hope in the bipartisan Iraq Study Group, James A. Baker III, former Secretary of State and former Representative Lee H. Hamilton. The quantity Baker and others like Condoleezza Rice, who must be a pragmatist, now the president’s ear, like the neoconservative hawks like Donald Rumsfeld and Cheney were the most influential advisors to this choice, however .

The Baker report is expected to present two alternative strategies. Again, whose gradual withdrawal of U.S. troops calls near their bases in Iraq where they are against new threats, emerging as a terrorist organization could be redeployed throughout the region. to enter the stability of first calls to maintain a presence in Baghdad and the promotion of the insurgents into the political arena, while Iraq’s neighbors, including Iran and Syria would be invited to contribute to ending fighting.

The Democrats also want all the recommendations of the Commission that the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 adopted are discussed.

My Reviews

Pelosi and the Democrats will try to be at their best, the corruption revealed by the government for some time, which is excellent. Republicans were a disgrace in this area.

Pelosi to enforce accountability with colleagues before the 2008 elections but then he’ll sell his majority, they maintained their democratic instincts to lead and begin to adopt their social and economic programs and raising taxes well above the board. This is contrary to the “little people” they say they love it.

On the other hand, I do not think the minimum wage increase, the U.S. economy or business will be as bad as feared. I actually believe in the theory of Henry Ford that raising workers’ wages to help them buy more products, ultimately helps the economy.

I do not know what the Democrats, but can do about Wall Mart and globalization of the economy. You want to look again into our trade agreements. Can we return to protectionism? Can you return the runaway horse in the stable? , I somehow doubt.

I have nothing against the Democrats we buy prescription drugs from Canada, which is a market solution to drug prices. I would, however, if they engage in price caps. With the economy with socialism manipulation, and led to the weakening economy, once again violating the “little people” at some point.

Regarding Iraq goes, I have great hopes for the Baker Commission. Both their solutions seem possible. Also, if you noticed, I suggested one of their solutions in a previous post.

Regarding the investigations against Bush and the Republicans, I say cool it Dems. Americans simply want to end the chaos. You’re in no mood for congressional hearings and indignation. Just trying to stay clean and, frankly, to solve our problems.

As for your agenda is, Madam President, congratulations. This is the first time I heard a democratic program for years. I can not disagree with that, but at least now we know your intentions, and we can in the debate.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Extreme american politics

When we talk in terms of policy terms, we must first define what is meant by “extreme”. Most researchers would agree that political extremism can be defined as a political philosophy or ideology of a character who is a little more distant and withdrawn from the ordinary or average. It is the farthest from the center, or outermost end. It is being done or the maximum for very long left or right political action, habit, or opinion.

In this spirit, it is fair to say that the body politic of the Untied States has largely changed to two extremes – liberal and conservative, as defined by the flat shapes of both Democratic and Republican parties. The dilemma is that neither party considers themselves as “extreme.” However, both parties categorically define each other by these extreme terms. They are perfectly capable of seeing the horrific nature of the extremist positions of their opposition, but not themselves. This is even more disturbing, then it is dangerous. Take a good look both extremes.

Liberalism was once philosophically favorable to progress and reform in political or religious, but the basic principles and to challenge the directors of the Constitution or the Holy Scripture. Liberalism was favorable and in line with concepts of maximum individual freedom in a society and government that was free of prejudice and bigotry. Liberalism advocated tolerance and generosity. The Liberals were patriots and champions of freedom. Now, compare this to modern liberalism.

Modern day liberalism can be defined as “secular progressivism” in a true sense Bill O’Reilly. No doubt, this is extreme. Modern liberalism will redistribute wealth by targeting the rich for most government revenues. They fully embrace the fly “Peter to pay Paul” mentality. This form of secular progressive liberalism embraces the entire welfare state “and is a champion of illegality in respect of the use of illicit drugs and illegal immigration. Hard work, and ingenuity will be taxed and penalized while laziness and illegal immigration will be rewarded by the redistribution of income.

Modern day liberalism embraces lax school discipline on American children to promote the so-called “freedom of minors.” Even He even deprive parents of their right to shape their own discipline, and outside from spring to experienced (and supported the Bible) between generations, and the universally accepted norms. This includes the occasional spanking (not to be confused with abusive beating). Instead secular progressive liberalism would replace with a new social order that claims to know what is best for children and their parents. They assume / replace responsibility for children from their parents. It is Orwellian in scope.

Liberalism has a modern day “one world” in U.S. foreign policy. He will be happy to abdicate the sovereignty of the American United Nations and a new world order. Modern day liberalism embraces fully all sorts of moral perversities pornography in literature, film, art and music to all kinds of promiscuity. All this is done in the name of “free speech” and a disturbing interpretation of the first amendment right to “freedom of expression.” This serious injury is not how the company it is. The emphasis on “individual rights” trumps the rights of a company under this new and modern secular progressive liberalism.

Liberals say modern-day “patriots” yet will do and say virtually anything disgrace or harm their own countries. With few exceptions, modern liberals seldom serve their country, but found nothing to attack those Thurs modern liberalism, in contrast to the liberalism of yesteryear, largely defines the meaning of “coward”. Modern liberalism has lost its generosity, his sense of fairness and fair play, and his patriotism.

Most modern liberals are lazy. They believe they are owed everything yet deserve virtually nothing. Few among them earn all they have. They are much more “takers” then they are “givers”. They are perpetual spoiled children, even in middle age and beyond. Liberals are extremely modern times stingy with their own money but they will be happy to everyone. They advocate gay rights but work diligently to negate “the rights of Christians.” Modern liberalism bears naked hostility to religious values and update their expression in public. They even display obscene perversities in the face expression of Christians in the name of freedom gradually. They do not care about those they offend.

Modern day liberalism embraces freedom only for its own ideals while denying the ideals, philosophies, and thoughts of any opposing view. Liberalism was once the champion of “tolerance” has become the most intolerant political ideology imaginable. of modern secular liberalism gradually personified the evil of hatred toward those who do their views and share these liberals outright Thurs damage if they could. This secular progressive liberalism is mean, scary and very dangerous.

Conservatism was once considered the slope of the policy to maintain the existing traditional order. Political conservatives urged caution or moderation, as a vision of behavior. They were strict constructionist constitutional and were strong on national defense issues and staunch supporters of the veterans and military. They were devout American patriots, almost to a spiritual level. Conservatives clearly embraced the ideal of free market and entrepreneurship. They believed in fiscal responsibility in government to include limiting spending and taxes. They were strong on issues of faith and advocates of religious freedom and expression. They saw themselves as “champions of the family.” Conservatism is a political philosophy and attitude that emphasized respect for traditional institutions, and distrust of government and governmental activism. Conservatism is in sharp contrast to sudden changes in the established order. Conservatism had a heart. Now, let’s take a look at modern conservatism.

conservatism of modern times could be better defined as “progressive fascism.” Not in terms of governmental system led by a single dictator but rather by an elite “powerful” I call the “fascist elite. A person may appear to be support, but he or she is sensitive to the fascist elite. It is only through a right of way “to go to this very select elite fascist” inner circle. The elite “fascist” is composed of powerful lobbies , and select and elite company, and inside the Conservative government. Trilateral Commission Members clearly fascist elite circle adjustment in this “inner” circle inside.

modern-day conservatives buck the traditional order as much as they embrace. They abhor secular progressive Supreme Court decisions that overturn traditional values of marriage and life, which is a reasonable and defensible argument. However, they have the freedom of the right person if she joyously advance their fascist conservative cause and further empower them. They are much more “pro-war” then they are “pro-military” and they wrongly think of them as one in the same. They prefer a “military offense” to “military defense” and I do not speak in terms of tactical or strategic military maneuver. I refer to a philosophical ideal and ideological.

They are quick to send troops into harms way to the Americas as they themselves or members of their family, never having to carry the load. conservative of modern times are quick to raise the flag, but slow service. Although there are exceptions, but this is mostly a normal and usual dynamic of modern day conservative movement. Most modern day conservatives are merely “military leaders courage” struggling just to stay our of a soldier in uniform most of them define the word “coward”.

The modern conservative thought to turn his back on anything American veterans once they have been spent and are no longer useful. They make loans to veterans past “but neglect to mention that they themselves have conducted most of these credits tooth and nail in the legislative process. Did they have got their way, our veterans of nations would be penniless and without adequate health care.

Conservatives hate the modern day social protection for the poor but embrace corporate welfare with frenzy. They are not only supporters of entrepreneurship and the capitalist ideal, which is good, but then they will make the nation and its great people to this aberration of that ideal in the interest of greed business, which is bad. They are not just against taxation in general, they changed the laws and procedures to ensure corporations and the richest of them can not completely avoid taxation, particularly in offshore accounts and of creative accounting.

Most of the richest people in our country are political conservatives and modern, they got greedy, so the human mind can understand. They have totally abandoned the “middle class” and, believe it or not, secular progressive with their “give everything” liberal cohorts, they are about to make America into two classes “rich and poor” in society. The American middle class is really in danger of collapse.

Conservatives speak of modern times is a wise course of being against “illegal immigration”, but when they belong to the presidency and both houses of Congress, they have absolutely nothing to prevent it. Instead they opened the way for illegal immigration and illegal entry into our country more than doubled. On the cheap labor for the operation of the modern conservative circles of the rich and greedy has become a mainstay for them, and immigration laws in America, and American workers are condemned because of it.

Conservatives in modern times merely transferring once secure and well paying jobs away from foreign shores. He desperate for workers, exploited and often victims of violence who are willing to work for a pittance await these once lucrative American jobs. The modern day conservatives thought nothing of letting their loyal workers and American employees stranded, destitute, unemployed, and having to feed themselves and their families in a more competitive market that only offers little more than salary minimum for college graduates themselves. Then they gather to the unemployment lines and welfare system, without health insurance and dental, both modern conservatives are reluctant to finance. Then, once they call their proud American workers “lazy profiteers.” conservative of modern times has lost its compassion in an abyss of economic quicksand where he can not be found.

modern-day conservatives have turned fiscal responsibility for tax and spending show that makes the most ardent liberals proud. They are always very strong on family and faith issues, as they decide the dogma and doctrine of what is acceptable. I do not mean to defend the Bible Scripture, which is good, but living outside the dictates of what they preach, which is bad. For example, they are against premarital sex, promiscuity, adultery and “lusting in the mind, but many of them are known for having some or all above with fever . Yet, they hypocritically attack an immoral Hollywood, which is truly immoral. They rile marriage to sodomy and gay, which is their right if faith and scripture based. Yet they imprison a gay couple, consenting adults who engage to gay sex in the privacy of their homes. To be against sodomy is defendable, but amounted to religious discrimination and will bring great harm to those who do not conform to your belief system is in no means a Christian. This is a trial, playing God, and I think God would do this. This is an “extreme” conservative position that if conservatism outside traditional flow.

The modern American politics has evolved into a bastion of petty political extremes. The political center was once the mainstream of American political society was slightly right of center. Some had liberal tendencies but nothing extreme. Some had more conservative tendencies but again nothing extreme. They were patriots, and both loved, even when they disagreed. They worked together for the good of the nation and another. Their was seldom any polarization. It is now a distant memory of our better days.

The two parties have been hijacked by the political extremes, the Left Democrats and Republicans on the right. They offer only candidates who take one extreme or the other. Candidates must “sell” to extremist ideologies before the American people the chance to decide. America desperately needs a third. A party of moderation and atonement. Part of patriotism. A party that supports business expenses, capitalism and the entrepreneurial spirit without embracing the spirit of evil of greed. A party that cares more about impotence and the powerful. Part of the Judea-Christian values. A party of tolerance but not to include tolerate extreme. A party that is slightly right of center and embraces traditional American values and morals, but is not afraid of change. A party that does not lose its direction and sense of compassion. A party that will never cease to care about its people and rewards hard work instead of guessing cheap.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Money to Conservation against republicans

I received several inquiries from different institutions within the Republican Party in recent months. They are all asking for money, little know by the cover of a real desire, which I think obscured. The first one I received was from Mr. Michael Steele himself and he has explicitly requested that the party could do to restore my confidence. Subsequent requests, sorry, I said, the surveys asked similar questions. In my reply to Mr. Steele, I explicitly what the party needs to regain my confidence. Based on the actions of the Party, I have my answer was lost in the mail. I guess it is possible that the response has been made, but I prefer, I do not think so. So, here is a slightly modified version of my reply.

I think the answer is simple but somehow it seems too complicated. simple subscription basis conservative principles and values is all that I ask, but in this complex and for some reason I do not understand the Party can not grasp this simple concept. Recent years have been painful when I saw the country sliding deeper into a morass of government corruption increasingly dismissed as unimportant, of fiscal irresponsibility on a massive scale, and a deeper recession and deeper, but totally unnecessary.

As I said, this seems too complex for the Labour Party to understand, so here are some examples where the party has abandoned us.

After the first victory of the Revolution “Republican” in 1994, turned to our new leadership in Congress have found to be anything other than guide … at least not what we expected. ” Our leaders are fighting for the lead and not good to ignore these principles, which led them to victory. Nevertheless, some good things in the early years were achieved after the revolution, but the party has never been able to educate the American public what they had accomplished.

2nd We were dismayed that, even when the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress, the Democratic minority in the program definition and in every public broadcasting appeared. It has become increasingly clear who is really responsible. When the Democrats regain control of it seemed they had only formalises what is already happening.

3rd Although I disagree with everything that President George W. Bush disagreed, while in the office, I that we have a really decent man in the White House had estimated a follow-up with clear convictions and the courage of those beliefs. So, I’ve always been shocked when his own party not initially support him, and that seemed to turn. How can expect out of our confidence, if they show a complete lack of loyalty to their own leaders? Under President Bush quickly recovered from what we still have serious consequences, September 11, 2001, we took the fight to the enemy in Afghanistan and then decimated the Al Queada in Iraq, the liberation of the Iraqi people the tyranny of a terrible life. We have enjoyed years of economic growth and historically low unemployment rates, and yet, as the bells of the economic disaster began to pay should, as it comes with a choice, it was not the republican experiment, the public America certainly knew that the right information with a sound decision. Instead the party has ignominiously by the President.

4th The current economic situation is the result of several things, but I firmly believe the situation would never have reached its present level, if it were not for action by some outrageous and hypocritical Democrats. Where was the voice of the Republicans to ensure the registration has been properly reported? Why so many Americans believe that the situation was all produced by the Wall Street Greed causes “and include only a few, the causes of the mortgage industry, especially the shameful actions of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac their sponsors Democrat?

5e elections are brutal. I understand that rage Democratic Governor Palin was certainly not unexpected. What I found shocking was the Republican response, or perhaps I should say the lack of response. Once again, you can imagine the party should support their own candidates do not trust? The actions of the party, I thought they were, unacceptable and indefensible.

6th I do not understand why the rules to allow open primaries Republicans in some states. The law allows the Republican candidate for president who are not in possession of part of the selected values. This must be corrected! How can we trust a party that does not fight for its own principles?

7th Polls have repeatedly shown that a large part of the American electorate to hold fundamentally conservative values. President Reagan has lost the power of development and the conservative base. Why then the party to go back the very thing that makes the most success? When discussing politics with friends and relatives of the opposing views, the craziest dare slander the left Reagan presidency, because they know it has been successful.

8th The Republican Party has a surprising inability to demonstrate its message. While most media, it is difficult, but it is not an excuse. Ronald Reagan was not the media on his side, and not even take advantage of talk radio or Fox News. Neither President Bush has relationships with major media and the media certainly was not with the member Gingrich when he led the “revolution” in 1994. The media have certainly not behind the GOP mid-term, as it has increased its leadership position in Congress in 2002 in a landslide victory. There is more media available, as ever, but the party seems unable to find their voice.

9th I look with horror that the Republican Party increasingly courted minorities and various interest groups, most of whom do not anyone’s interest at heart, but themselves. I find it difficult, an organization that are ready to chase the shadows and reigns with the winds of political correctness is trust.

Like I said, the Party is really for my money. The answer is no. current response to the appointment, Sotomayor, apparently solving the tepid, at best, and big Republican “listening” tour with none other than Senator McCain’s tone deaf, show that you are not worthy of my limited but hard-earned money. Oh say, does not mean I will not give money and support. The election of 2010 is the largest I have ever seen in my life. The people we elect to Congress are two key tasks: first line on the debacle of government later hold, and start the second, to reverse the shameful disaster Constitutional held to date. I will look for candidates who express, and the most important act in a true conservative values. These are those whom I uphold.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Abraham Lincon’s political party

Barack Obama is a Democrat. Most people know that. What many do not know that man sees Obama for the most political (and now presidential) the inspiration and leadership has been a. … Republicans!

Exactly. hero Barack Obama, Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. Lincoln is not just any ole Republicans either. He was one of the founders of the Republican Party and was elected the first Republican president.

The Republican Party was founded in 1854 in Ripon, Wisconsin. Its main objective was to stop the expansion of slavery in western territories. Lincoln had paid with the Whig Party, decomposition, had been largely involved in cross-sectional view of rivalries. Since Lincoln was personally against slavery, he found the Republican party platform more to his liking.

The first Republican president, John C. Fremont, which was in 1856. But Fremont has been largely regional appeal, and he was beaten by James Buchanan. In 1860, however, things would be different.

Before Lincoln’s presidential candidate in 1860, he campaigned in his home state of Illinois for the U.S. Senate. At that time senators were elected from their diet. Lincoln was the Republican candidate for Senate, but since the Republican Party was so new, it has lost. However, the number of debates Lincoln had Democratic opponent Stephen Douglas met a great interest in the country.

Lincoln followed by his Senate campaign with a series of pamphlets and speeches that have caught the attention of the nation. It has been a leader against the extension of slavery, and in 1860, proved to be the Republican candidate for the presidency.

Although the appeal of the Republican Party was still regional (at the time, in the north-east), the entire nation was divided regional stage. There was, in fact, four candidates for office this year, including former Senate campaign rival, Lincoln, Stephen Douglas. No candidate received a majority of votes, but the benefit of the population was in the North Lincoln Electoral College majority – which made him become the 16th President of the United States and the first president, the Republicans .

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment